???????????????????? /u/wangdh ???????????????????

????

Nature?????????????л???? ???

???? 17688 ????? 2010-10-24 22:14 |???????:???????|??????:???б??| nature

Nature?????????????л????
?????????
 
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Nature?????????????л????????????????????б?????????о?????????仰?????????????????????????????????????????
 
??????????????“??????Nature ???‘????’??”??????????????е??ζ?????????????????????????????Щ???д?????????????????????????????????????飬????и????????????о????????????????????????????Щ?????????????????κι????????????????????
 
????????漰????????1??Chinese Journal 31%?????????????2?????????й????????й???????????????????????Nature???????????????????漰???????????в??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????й????????????????????????
 
???Nature ?????????“Plagiarism is becoming more common in China, as it is elsewhere.” ??仰???????????????????????л???????????????????????????й??????????????????????????????????й?????????й????????о????????????????????ó??????????????????????????????????????????й?????????????????????????????????????????????????????“in China”??????“Chinese Academy of Sciences”????????????????????????д?????????????????????????????䶮
 
??????????Щ????????????????????Щ??????
1?????????????????????????????????????й????
2???????????е?????????????????????????????У????
3?????????????????Σ??????????????е???
      
       ???????????????Nature???????????????????????????????????????????????л????????????
 
Nature???壺
“Plagiarism not rooted in culture
 Don’t blame ancient Chinese culture for modern evils in science (Nature 467, 153: 2010). Plagiarism is becoming more common in China, as it is elsewhere. But this problem cannot be rooted in Chinese culture, otherwise it would have existed widely in ancient China and still be evident across Chinese communities today.
Copying out of respect in order to learn, with appropriate citation, is not the same as plagiarism, which is copying to steal credit.”
“???????????
  ??????????е???й??????й?????? (Nature 467, 153: 2010)?? ?????????????????????й??????????????????????????????й???????????????????й??????????????????????????????
 ??????????????????????????????????????????????????”
 
 
?????л??????????????????????????????? tuner ??λ?????????????????????????????????л???????????????????‘What a shame’???о????????????????????????????д?????????????????????????
 
 
?????????????? [2010-10-20 20:02:58]     ???  ??? 
Compare with Chinese, my personal view is that it is more difficult to shorten an article in English. The version above in your writing is one of the best I have seen for a while - sharp, smart and logical. But it would take someone with good English to appreciate it, which is appearing to be lacking here. What a shame, I have to say.

?????????Thanks.?????????????????Ρ?
???????????????????????й?????????????More common??
 
???????????tuner [2010-10-20 21:02:37]     ???  ???
????ο???????????????о?NATURE?????????????????????????á??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Don't blame ... ?????????????? sth not rooted ...???????????????????????±?д????仰??????????????????????????????????????????????á?????????????????????

????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????1??31% ????????????2???й??????????????
????????????????????й?????????????More common??
 
 
?????????????????????????????????????飬????????塢??????Щ???????????????????????????????????????л???????????????????????????????????????????顣
 
??????????и?л??
??????? 2010.10.24??


?й???????31%?????
https://blog.szjingmu.com/blog-41757-376719.html

?????????????á???????????????
?????????????60??????????????????
??? IP: .*| ???|

23 ?????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? Ф??? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?Y???? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???

???????? ???? (13 ??????)

?????????...

Archiver|?????|????? ( ??ICP??07017567??-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-9 22:56

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- ?й????????

???????